Legal Opinion
Cather v. Catheter Technology Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided January 2, 1991No. Civ. A. W89-0055(B)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the Motion of Defendant, Catheter Technology Corporation, for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has responded to the Motion. The Court, having considered the Motion and response, together with supporting and opposing memoranda of authorities and attachments thereto, is of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is well taken and should therefore be granted.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
John C. Cather, Jr. was diagnosed with colon cancer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Mrs. Frances Buckley Ward, Cross-Appellant v. The Hobart Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Hammond v. Coleman Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999
- McKee v. Bowers Window & Door Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Estate of LaMontagne v. SquibbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Austin v. Will-Burt Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.