Legal Opinion

Mills v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 3, 1999No. A99A2324, A99A2325PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eldridge, Judge.

This case comes on appeal after the trial court granted a new trial on special grounds to Norfolk Southern Railway Company 1 on the train-vehicle collision that occurred when the automatic warning devices at the crossing failed to timely activate before the vehicle entered the crossing. The special ground for the grant stated that testimony as to prior notice of the gravity of danger from activation failures of automatic crossing warning devices, evidenced by similar occurrences, should not have been admitted, because each such occurrence had not been shown to be substantially…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P. A. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. ConkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Wright v. DilbeckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Saltis v. A.B.B. Daimler BenzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API