Legal Opinion
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Meeks
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 9, 1998No. S98A1121PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hines, Justice.
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul) appeals the denials of its motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on its claims of unjust enrichment and constructive trust in its suit against A. P. Meeks, Jr. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
A. P. Meeks, Jr. is the husband of Cona Meeks, who was employed by Alma Exchange Bank. After certain credit card accounts in her control were discovered to be out of balance, the bank arranged for an independent audit which concluded that Ms. Meeks had embezzled over $372,000 between 1988 and 1991. She…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Engram v. EngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Williams v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Goggin v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Norfolk Southern Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Williams v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Morrell v. Wellstar Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Perry Golf Course Development, LLC v. HOUS. AUTH. OF CITY OF ATLANTACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Six Flags Over Georgia, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.