Legal Opinion
Hasenfus v. Corporate Air Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 27, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1412PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:
In this diversity proceeding, plaintiffs Eugene and Sally Hasenfus, husband and wife, seek to recover damages from defendants Corporate Air Services (“Corporate Air”), Southern Air Transport (“Southern Air”), Richard Secord (“Secord”) and Albert Hakim (“Hakim”). Their claim for damages stems from an alleged breach of a written employment contract between Eugene Hasenfus and Corporate Air. Plaintiffs allege that Corporate Air is a mere facade dominated and controlled by the other defendants to carry out their wrongful and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Robinson Engineering Company, Ltd. Pension Plan and Trust and R. W. Robinson & Associates Company Profit Sharing Plan v. Mark G. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Wiggins v. Equifax Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.