Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2000No. CIV.A.99-2496 GKPublishedCited by 185 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
1. Introduction
The United States of America (“the Government”) seeks recovery of health care expenses under the Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2651 et seq., and the Medicare Secondary Payment provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395y, and disgorgement under the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, (“RICO”) from nine companies 1 and two affiliated organizations 2 involved in the cigarette industry.
This matter is now before the Court upon the motion of one of the eleven Defendants, British…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Kopff v. BattagliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.