Legal Opinion
Plassil v. O'Hearne
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 27, 1954No. 3647PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The complainant in this case seeks by review to set aside the order of the Deputy Commissioner dismissing a claim for compensation under the federal Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. The respondents have filed motions to dismiss the complaint. The case has been heard and considered on the pleadings and the record made before the Deputy Commissioner. The oral argument and briefs of counsel have been considered. On the record before the Deputy Commissioner it is my conclusion that the respondents’ motion to dismiss must be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. P. J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960