Legal Opinion
Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 7, 1952No. 229PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Minton
Court.
These four cases present the same question, namely, the construction and application of the statute of limitations provision of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, § 13 (a), 33 U. S. C. § 913 (a), which provides in pertinent part as follows:
“The right to compensation for disability under this Act shall be barred unless a claim therefor is filed within one year after the injury . . . .”
*198The claims here involved were filed from eighteen to twenty-four months from the dates the employees were injured. The Deputy Commissioner held that the claims were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Federal Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- United Engineering Co. v. PillsburyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
3Cited by104 opinions
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Northeast Hospital Corp. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Bertram A. Watson and R. J. Shea, Deputy Commissioner v. Gulf Stevedore CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Paul Eugene Tessier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.