Dorsey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Robert Dorsey (Claimant) petitions for review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the Work ers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s claim petition. Claimant contends the WCJ’s decision rejecting his medical evidence violates the reasoned decision requirements of Section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1 We affirm.
Claimant, a carpenter, has a history of knee problems. He had meniscectomy surgery on his right knee in 1978 and on his left knee in 1981. He had no further problems with his knees…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Empire Steel Castings, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Budd Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- A & J Builders, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Amandeo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Furnari v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pryor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.