Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2006PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Robert Dorsey (Claimant) petitions for review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the Work ers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s claim petition. Claimant contends the WCJ’s decision rejecting his medical evidence violates the reasoned decision requirements of Section 422(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1 We affirm.

Claimant, a carpenter, has a history of knee problems. He had meniscectomy surgery on his right knee in 1978 and on his left knee in 1981. He had no further problems with his knees…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Empire Steel Castings, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Budd Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. A & J Builders, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Amandeo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Furnari v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Pryor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API