Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Norwest Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 2004No. 23,423PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s decision denying class certification under Rule 1-023 NMRA 2004. The appeal raises several issues, including the legal standards for determining whether a class definition is legally sufficient and the standards under which the predominance and superiority criteria of Rule 1-023(B)(3) are tested with regard to manageability. We also review the decision for substantial evidence. We affirm the district court.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
{2} Plaintiffs sued Defendants (Norwest) on behalf of themselves and others who…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Starko, Inc. v. PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH PLANNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Davis v. Devon Energy Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.