Legal Opinion
Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 7, 1986No. 85-2365PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Marvin Kagan, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s refusal to reinstate his complaint. We affirm.
I
Marvin Kagan filed a complaint in November 1983 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that the defendants, Caterpillar Tractor Co. (“Caterpillar”) and three Caterpillar employees, forced Kagan, then 60 years old, to take early retirement in violation of the Age Discrimination Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and also discriminated against Kagan because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Rayford v. Pryor, Jr. v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Donald McCormick v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Linda James v. McDonald Corporation, Simon Marketing, Incorporated, and Ante Enterprises Llc, Doing Business as McDonald RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Gregory C. Jones, for the Estate of Barbara S. McEwen v. Sandra Lee Phipps, A/K/A Sandra R. PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.