Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1937No. Civ. 5746PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

—The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to an order sustaining separate demurrers to the complaint for an alleged conspiracy to commit a tort. The plaintiff asked leave to file an amended complaint, which was denied. The proposed pleading is included in the transcript on appeal. It is contended the proposed amended complaint states a good cause of action, and that the court abused its discretion in not permitting it to be filed.

Both the complaint and the proposed amended pleading purport to charge the judge of the police court of Stockton and other officers of the court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Dowdell v. CarpyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fetterley v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Roos v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Plum v. BecketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Eustace v. DechterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Gaines v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API