Roos v. Harris
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendants made and entered in the superior court in and for the county of Santa Cruz after the granting of a motion made by the defendants for a judgment on the pleadings, upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This action was one for malicious prosecution, the complaint alleging that the defendants caused to be instituted against the plaintiff a criminal proceeding for petit larceny, by reason of which the plaintiff was arrested, tried, found guilty, and sentenced to imprisonment for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Black v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Parrish v. Latham & WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Webb v. YoumansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Merron v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.