Legal Opinion

Roos v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 11991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendants made and entered in the superior court in and for the county of Santa Cruz after the granting of a motion made by the defendants for a judgment on the pleadings, upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This action was one for malicious prosecution, the complaint alleging that the defendants caused to be instituted against the plaintiff a criminal proceeding for petit larceny, by reason of which the plaintiff was arrested, tried, found guilty, and sentenced to imprisonment for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Black v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kachig v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Parrish v. Latham & WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Webb v. YoumansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Merron v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API