Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hardy v. Vial

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1957No. L. A. 24292Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CARTER, J., Dissenting and Concurring.

I dissent.

I agree with that portion of the majority opinion which holds that an action for malicious prosecution may be founded upon the institution of a proceeding before an administrative agency, and that the judgment in favor of Vial, a nonsehool defendant, should be reversed.

I cannot agree with that portion of the opinion which holds that the seven school defendants are entitled to hide behind the outmoded cloak of immunity from civil liability. Furthermore this is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the sustaining of a demurrer to a complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Barker v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API