Matter of Montgomery

MARTIN, Judge.

By their appeal, respondents assert that the trial court’s denial of their motion to modify the original judgments, without permitting them to offer evidence in support thereof, was error. They contend also that the subsequent order terminating visitation was not supported by competent evidence. We find no error with respect to either order.

In their first assignment of error respondents contend that the trial judge erred by refusing to hear evidence on their motion to modify the termination of their parental rights and by denying their motion. Respondents’ motion for…