Legal Opinion

In re M.D., N.D.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 2009No. COA09-500PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Jose D., Respondent-Father, appeals from orders terminating his parental rights in M.D. (“Michelle”)1 ánd N.D. (“Natalya”).2 After careful consideration of the record and briefs in light of the applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s orders.

Shannon W. (Petitioner-Mother) and Respondent-Father are the parents of Michelle and Natalya. Petitioner-Mother and Respondent-*37Father were married on 8 March 1996; separated in August 2000; and divorced on 9 August 2002. Michelle and Natalya, who are twins, were the only children bom of the marriage. In February 2003, Petitioner-Mother…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. In re P.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In Re PMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Matter of HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re M.K. (I)Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. In re C.G.R.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. In re T.L.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. In re: A.M. & E.R.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. In re: J.A.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API