Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2000No. 24669PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

Appellant Andrea C. Wright (A.Wright) appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence, from the sentence imposed, and the denial of a Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

On September 5, 1997, A. Wright was a passenger in a pick-up truck driven by her husband, Eugene W. Wright (E.Wright), when they were stopped by Jerome County Sheriffs Deputy, Jason Pietrzak (Pietrzak), for E. Wright’s failure to signal while making a turn. Upon stopping the vehicle, Pietrzak approached the driver’s side…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DuValtIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. StrandIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HollandIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HanslovanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API