Legal Opinion

Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 20, 1964No. 106PublishedCited by 466 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

As in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., ante, p. 225, the question here is whether the use of a state unfair competition law to give relief against the copying of an unpatented industrial design conflicts with the federal patent laws. Both Compeo and Day-Brite are manufacturers of fluorescent lighting fixtures of a kind widely used in offices and stores. Day-Brite in 1955 secured from the Patent Office a design patent on a reflector having cross-ribs claimed to give both strength and attractiveness to the fixture. Day-Brite also sought, but was refused, a mechanical patent on the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Compco Corporation, Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. Compco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

3Cited by466 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

461 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API