Legal Opinion

Holt v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & Revenue

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2002No. 27,445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Chief Justice.

{1} This Court granted the petition of James A. Holt and Terri L. Holt (taxpayers) for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals following its affirmance of the New Mexico Department of Taxation and Revenue (Department) hearing officer’s denial of their protest and request for a refund. Holt v. N.M. Dep’t of Taxation & Revenue, NMCA 22,622, slip op. at 1 (Mar. 5, 2002), cert. granted, 132 N.M. 193, 46 P.3d 100 (2002). The taxpayers argue that they are not liable for state income tax on wages earned by their employment within New Mexico. We hold that employment…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Landess v. GARDNER TURF GRASS, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Stockton v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. CCA of Tennessee v. N.M. Tax'n and Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Hammack v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API