Legal Opinion

Landess v. GARDNER TURF GRASS, INC.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2008No. 27,312PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Chief Judge.

{1} Pro se Appellants, David and Paula Landess (Taxpayers), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Gardner Turf Grass, Inc. (Gardner), dismissing their complaint and imposing sanctions under Rule 1-011 NMRA for bringing a frivolous action. Taxpayers argue that summary judgment and sanctions were improperly granted. Concluding that Taxpayers’ arguments are without merit, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

{2} David Landess is an at-will employee of Gardner. Directed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Gardner withheld federal income taxes…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bernier v. BernierNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Weiss v. Thi of New Mexico at Valle Norte, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bernier v. BernierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Brannock v. The Lotus FundNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Garcia v. UNM Bd. of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API