Legal Opinion
Seville Industrial MacHinery Corp. v. Southmost MacHinery Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 8, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-149PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Seville Industrial Machinery Corporation, instituted this action against defendants, Southmost Machinery Corporation (“Southmost”), Tri-State Machinery Corporation (“Tri-State”), Norman Gellman (“Gellman”), an officer of Southmost and Tri-State, and Paolo Alfieri (“Alfieri”), an officer of Southmost. Plaintiff alleges violations of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., fraud, breach of contract, and conversion. Jurisdiction is asserted under 18 U.S.C. § 1964 and under the principles of pendent…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.