Legal Opinion

Sauk County v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

In November, 1933, the county board of supervisors of Sauk county adopted the relief program provided by ch. 363, Laws of 1933, and appointed three persons, who were members of the poor committee, to act as a relief committee with whom the WERA (Wisconsin Emergency Relief Administration) co-operated in setting up the county’s relief administration. The pommittee selected a relief administrator. She later resigned and the committee then appointed a successor from among four candidates nominated by the Industrial Commission.

On August 2, 1934, Edward O. Triggs, aged thirty-eight, became the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Indrebo v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Marathon County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Donnelly's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. In re the Settlement of MatruskiNew York County Court, Broome County · 1938
  4. Marathon County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API