Legal Opinion

Marathon County v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellant contends: (1) That the work which the deceased was doing when injured was only “made work,” and that for this reason the county is not liable under *279the rule of West Milwaukee v. Industrial Comm. 216 Wis. 29, 255 N. W. 728; and (2) that, as the county board never authorized the acts of its highway commissioner or highway committee pursuant to which the deceased was put to work, those acts were void and imposed no liability upon the county.(1) While it may be that the work the deceased was doing was “made work” similar to that involved in the West Milwaukee Case, supra, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Joyce v. Sauk CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Endion Improvement Co. v. Evening Telegram Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Knapp v. PohleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raube v. ChristensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Marathon County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sauk County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Opinion No. Oag 20-88, (1988), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1988
  5. City of Madison v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API