Youse v. Employers Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This was an action to recover for the loss and damage to a star sapphire ring caused by fire. Plaintiff insured prevailed in the court below and defendant company has appealed.
For convenience, the parties will be referred to as the insured and the company.
Roth parties state the sole question for determination to be:
“Is the loss resulting from damage to jewelry, by a fire intentionally kindled in and confined to a place where fire was intended to be, insured against under the terms of the fire insurance policy in question?”
The facts, which are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Knouse v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. NamanTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Spence v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- McGraw v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J.R. Maffei Richard Maffei Betty J. Maffei v. Northern Insurance Company of New York Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Jameson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Saul v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.