Spence v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This was an action on the double indemnity clause of a life insurance policy. The jury answered special questions and returned a general verdict for plaintiff, upon which judgment was rendered. Defendant has appealed.
The pleadings may be summarized briefly as follows: On September 20, 1926, defendant issued its policy of insurance upon the life of Noel H. Spence, husband of plaintiff, who was named beneficiary, for $5,000 single or $10,000 double indemnity. The policy was in effect on September 7, 1939, on which date the insured and his son,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. NewmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Anderson v. Inter-State Business Men's Accident Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Sebal v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kendall Plumbing, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Capital Bank & Trust Co. v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOCIETY OF USSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Transamerica Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Gage Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Miller v. World Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.