Legal Opinion

Crystal Construction Corp. v. Hartigan

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 27, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWheatley, J.

On January 23,1995, the plaintiff (Crystal), hired by the defendant-*33landowners (the Hartigans, or Susan or Michael) for excavation and site work to be done on their property, sued for payment for the work. After trial, judgment entered on March 16,1998 in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $14,459.07, plus interest of $5452.46 and costs of $161.90, for a total of $20,073.432 Thereafter, there were numerous motions made by the Hartigans, which, along with the trial judgment, are the subject of two Rule 8A Expedited Appeals. One appeal basically requests review of several trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Lubell v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crystal Construction Corp. v. HartiganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API