Legal Opinion
Crystal Construction Corp. v. Hartigan
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 31, 2002No. 00-P-1737PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The defendants, Michael and Susan Hartigan, appeal from a decision of the Appellate Division, Southern District. The decision affirmed the denial by a District Court judge of their motion for “removal/appeal” of the case to the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 104, following a nonjury trial in the District Court. It also affirmed various other rulings by the same District Court judge, including an award of sanctions against the defendant Michael Hartigan (Michael), an attorney appearing pro se in this litigation, for fifing a frivolous pleading, and assessed attorney’s fees and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Champigny v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Avery v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Lubell v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Allen v. BatchelderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Orasz v. Colonial Tavern, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lashus v. SlaterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
- Telman v. BrinkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Randolph v. Madison Square Realty Management, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Signature Flight Support Corp. v. Global NAPs Realty, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Choice Health v. Devcon Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.