Legal Opinion

Phifer v. Baker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1926No. 1191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Potter, Chief Justice.

Myrtle Baker, by Harry J. Baker, her father, as next friend, brought this action against the defendant, Fred W. Phifer, to recover damages for alleged malpractice as a physician and surgeon. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff upon all of the issues and assessing the damages in the sum of $10,000. The case is here on error for a review of the judgment rendered upon that verdict.

The material averments of the petition are: That the defendant is a practicing physician and surgeon located at Wheatland. That on the early evening of July 2, 1921, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Mitchell v. HindmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Priestley v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Mitchell v. HindmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. Hunter v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Govin v. HunterWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Culver v. SekulichWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Branson v. RoelofszWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Eagan v. O'MalleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API