Legal Opinion

Rogowski v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965No. Calendar 11, Docket 50,463PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs are residents of Detroit and users of water supplied by it. They brought this chancery action to enjoin defendant city, its common council, board of water commissioners, and board of health from enforcing a water fluoridation ordinance, and to have it declared illegal and void. An order entered declaring this to be a class action, ■on behalf of all users of Detroit’s public water supply who object to its fluoridation. The State Dental Association and Detroit Dental Society were permitted to intervene as parties defendant. Defendants moved for summary judgment in their favor. Their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Matter of ViemeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Kaul v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Baer v. CITY OF BENDOregon Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Minn. State Bd. of Health v. City of BrainerdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Graybeal v. McNevinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  3. Cloverlanes Bowl, Inc v. GordonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Reinhardt v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Rowen & Blair Electric Co v. Flushing Operating CorpMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API