Legal Opinion

King v. Moreland

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1931No. Docket No. 6700PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

From the record presented on this appeal it appears that for the sum of $4,250 defendant purchased from plaintiff’s assignor a two-thirds interest in “one ambulance, all the furnishings and equipment located down stairs at 1011 North Wilmington street, Compton, California, and all outstanding contracts with any person, corporation, or municipality, the subject of which are the performance of duties connected with the undertaking business, which the said lessor has this day entrusted to the care of the undersigned”. In payment thereof, defendant executed what is entitled a “purchase lease”,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnois v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Easton Packing Co. v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Knobloch v. BaderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. George Schaeffer, Jr., and Elsie Schaeffer, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of HoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Del Riccio v. PhotochartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Pappas v. CourembisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Rydeen v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API