Legal Opinion

Arnois v. Bell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1924No. Docket No. 4914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him in an action to recover the unpaid balance upon the purchase price of a certain X-ray dental unit sold to the defendant.

The transaction between the parties was evidenced by a writing, describing the article sold, reciting that the purchase price was to be $845, payable in monthly installments of $50 each, to be evidenced by promissory notes. The following clause then appears in the contract: “It is further agreed and understood that the above described goods are to remain the property of Charles Arnois until payment has been made…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. MorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Casady v. FryAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API