Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Rush Products Division of Lake Center Industries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1979No. 48627Published

1Opinion of the Court

284 N.W.2d 538 (1979)

Kathleen M. HOLLIDAY, Respondent,

v.

RUSH PRODUCTS DIVISION OF LAKE CENTER INDUSTRIES et al., Relators.

No. 48627.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 13, 1979.

Fitch & Johnson and Larry J. Peterson, Minneapolis, for relators.

Grose, Von Holtum, Von Holtum, Sieben & Schmidt and Timothy J. McCoy, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard before KELLY, WAHL, and STONE, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.

KELLY, Justice.

This workers' compensation case was heard before the Workers' Compensation Division. The compensation judge found for the employee on all issues and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Fisher v. RED & WHITE TAXI COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Mansfield v. Gopher Aviation CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Briggs v. K. W. McKee, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API