Legal Opinion

Miller v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 28, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

An employee sought medical benefits from a group employee benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to 1461 (1985). The employer/insurer rejected the claim and allegedly threatened to terminate the employee if she continued to pursue it. In response, the employee quit and sued the employer under state tort and contract law.

We hold that the trial court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. All of the plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by ERISA.

FACTS

We state the facts in a light most favorable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PacifiCorp v. Public Service Com'n of Wyo.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Batiza v. SuperfonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API