Legal Opinion

Batiza v. Superfon

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 24, 1992No. Nos. 2 CA-CV 92-0167, 2 CA-CV 92-0168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellees George and Esperanza Batiza filed suit against appellant Neil P. Super-fon as trustee of the NPS Defined Contribution Pension Plan (Pension Plan) for failure to pay a promissory note. The trial court granted the Batizas’ motion for summary judgment, and the trustee has appealed, arguing that disputed fact issues exist so as to preclude entry of summary judgment.

In attempting to collect their judgment, the Batizas discovered that the Pension Plan had been terminated and its assets transferred to Arizona Skin and Laser Surgery Profit Sharing Plan (Profit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Shah v. BalochCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API