Legal Opinion

Donahue v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1932No. 6568PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of operating a still, and he appeals from the judgment solely on the ground that the evidence adduced against him was procured by an unlawful search and seizure, and that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress this evidence. Upon the motion to suppress, witnesses were introduced on behalf of the appellant and on behalf of the government. The motion was denied as to appellant and granted as to a codefendant, one Rash, in whose favor the court ordered a directed verdict.-

At the time appellant was arrested he and Rash were operating a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
  5. Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ruth Johnson Williams and Fred Cook, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. State v. DeltenreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Papani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Rocchia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Koch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API