Legal Opinion
State v. Fremgen
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1996No. S-6926PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER NO. 33
The Court having previously granted the State’s Petition for Hearing, and having considered the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, and being fully advised in the premises, hereby enters the following order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The State’s Petition for Hearing is DISMISSED as improvidently granted.
2. We have concluded that the State’s Petition for Hearing was improvidently granted for the following reasons:
The State asks to overrule State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836 (Alaska 1978); Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25 (Alaska 1978); Alex v. State, 484 P.2d 677 (Alaska 1971), and Speidel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DunlopAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Evans v. McTaggartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Native Village of Tununak v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Kinegak v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.