Legal Opinion
David Hill Development, LLC v. City of Forest Grove
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 23, 2010No. Civ. 08-266-ACPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge:
Introduction
Plaintiff David Hill Development, LLC (“Plaintiff’) alleges five claims against Defendants City of Forest Grove (“the City”), Steve Wood (“Wood”), and Robert Foster (“Foster”) (collectively “Defendants”): inverse condemnation in violation of the Oregon Constitution, Article I, Section 18; inverse condemnation in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in conjunction with 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”); retaliation under the First Amendment and section 1983; violation of equal…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Depaul Industries v. Benjamin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Lafarge North America, Inc. v. K.E.C.I. Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- DePaul Industries v. City of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Foshee v. Lane CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Sagers v. PanchanathanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023