State v. Jenkins
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
These two cases, consolidated on appeal, present the question whether principles of due process or equal protection *673require that an individual arrested for driving while intoxicated, RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1985), be advised, prior to submitting to a chemical test for intoxication, that the results of the test may result in a charge for the more serious offense of aggravated driving while intoxicated, RSA 265:82-a (Supp. 1985). We hold that neither the due process nor the equal protection clause of either the State or Federal Constitutions requires that individuals be apprised of the possibility…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Gazzola v. ClementsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. LeveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hare v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. DenneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Hill v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State v. BarkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.