Legal Opinion
State v. Barkus
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 31, 2005No. 2004-742PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Suzanne Barkus, appeals her conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. See RSA 265:82 (2004). She argues that the Salem District Court (Korbey, J.) erred in failing to inform the parties whether it had suppressed the results of a breath test administered following an alleged violation of her Miranda rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). The defendant contends that if the results were admitted, the trial court improperly relied upon them, and that if they were not, then the evidence was insufficient to convict her. We affirm.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Estate of Sicotte v. Lubin & Meyer, P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State of New Hampshire v. Stephen SocciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. Felix RuizSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.