Legal Opinion

Winn v. Architectural Access Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 9, 1987No. 86-1037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

In violation of a regulation of the Architectural Access Board (board) which requires that “[e]ach floor [of a restaurant] ... be of a common level or be connected by ramps,”3 the Seasons Restaurant of the Bostonian Hotel was constructed so that approximately a third of the patrons dine on a raised platform unconnected by a ramp. After receiving a letter from the board stating that it had received information that the restaurant was in violation of the regulation, the plaintiff sought a variance. When, subsequent to a hearing, the variance was denied, he sought judicial review of the agency…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yerardi's Moody Street Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Town of Northbridge v. Town of Natick Department of Social ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of RockportMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Lotto v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. School Committee of Franklin v. Commissioner of Educ.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pyramid Co. v. Architectural Barriers BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Home-Like Apartments, Inc. v. Architectural Access BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Central Water District Associates v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  4. Dinatale v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1993
  5. Division of Capital Planning & Operations v. TLT Construction Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API