Legal Opinion

Pyramid Co. v. Architectural Barriers Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 1, 1988PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

In May, 1984, several handicapped individuals filed a complaint with the Architectural Barriers Board3 (board) alleging numerous violations of the board’s regulations govem-ing access of handicapped persons to the Hampshire Mall, a shopping center owned by the Pyramid Company of Hadley (Pyramid). Pyramid then corrected many of the alleged violations and filed with the board a request for three variances from the board’s regulations. One variance sought an exemption from the requirement of providing elevator access to the mezzanine level of the mall.

The board held an informal hearing and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Medi-Cab of Massachusetts Bay, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Brooks v. Architectural Barriers BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Winn v. Architectural Access BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Doherty v. Retirement Board of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Zachs v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. City of Leominster v. StrattonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API