Legal Opinion

Dinatale v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 29, 1993No. 92-3662Published

1Opinion of the CourtDortch, J.

Plaintiff brings this action seeking judicial review of a decision rendered by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (“CRAB”) denying her request to redeposit her refunded accumulated deductions and to be reinstated as a member of the Cambridge Retirement System. After a review of the administrative record, the court finds that CRAB’S decision was based upon an erroneous interpretation of the law and was therefore violative of the substantial *249rights of the petitioner under the considerations enumerated in G.L.c. 30A, §14. For the reasons outlined below, the decision is REVERSED.

BACKGROUND

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vaspourakan, Ltd. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Pyramid Co. v. Architectural Barriers BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Boston Retirement Board v. McCormickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. School Committee v. Bureau of Special Education AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. State Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API