Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1999No. 98-491PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 The Durdens filed this action against Chief Industries, Incorporated and Hydro Flame Corporation in the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, to recover damages for injuries sustained while inhabiting a fifth-wheel trailer manufactured and sold by Chief Industries and heated by a furnace manufactured by Hydro Flame. Chief Industries and Hydro Flame filed cross-claims against each other seeking indemnification from the other in the instance either was found liable. Prior to trial the Durdens and Hydro Flame reached a court-approved settlement and the District Court dismissed both *320cross…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Deere & Co. v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  2. Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bylsma v. R.C.WilleyHumanTouchUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hulstine v. Lennox Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API