Attorney Grievance Commission v. Marano
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, seeking disciplinary action against Philip S. Maraño, a member of the Maryland Bar since November 9, 1956. Bar Counsel charged violations of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6); 5-104(A); 6-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 9-102(A)(l), (2) and (B)(1), (3) and (4). 1 He also was charged with violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1981 Repl.Vol., 1985 Cum.Supp.) Art. 10, § 44. 2 We shall disbar.
I
Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred the matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaranoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZdravkovichCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TrillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 023, Maryland Attorney General Reports2013