Law v. Siegel
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
*417 The Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor may exempt certain assets from the bankruptcy estate. It further provides that exempt assets generally are not liable for any expenses associated with administering the estate. In this case, we consider whether a bankruptcy court nonetheless may order that a debtor's exempt assets be used to pay administrative expenses incurred as a result of the debtor's misconduct.
I. Background
A
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code gives an insolvent debtor the opportunity to discharge his debts by liquidating his assets to pay his creditors. 11 U.S.C. §§ 704 (a)(1),…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by797 opinions
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Azar v. Allina Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- In Re Energy Future Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
792 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.