Legal Opinion
Wooten v. BNSF Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided April 23, 2019No. CV 16-139-M-DLCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
Pending before the Court are the following post-trial motions: Plaintiff Zachary Wooten's Motion for Amended Judgment (Doc. 296), Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. 301), and Defendant BNSF Railway Company's ("BNSF") Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion for New Trial, to Alter or Amend Judgment, and Remittitur, and Request for Oral Argument (Doc. 307). For the following reasons, BNSF's various motions are denied in their entirety and Wooten's motions are granted in part and denied in part.
DISCUSSION
Wooten was unlawfully terminated by BNSF on September 29,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fresquez v. BNSF RailwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Blessing v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Fresquez v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Fresquez v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.