Legal Opinion

Ried v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1993No. 10S04-9306-CR-670PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

During appellant Steven Ried’s trial, the court admitted evidence which might now be excluded under Lannan v. State (1992), Ind., 600 N.E.2d 1334. A divided Court of Appeals held on appeal that such evidence does not constitute fundamental error such that the issue may be argued on appeal without an objection at trial. This is correct.

After an initial mistrial, Ried was convicted of two counts of child molesting, a class C felony, Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3(b) (West 1986), and found to be an habitual offender. He presented two issues on appeal. First, Ried contended that his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Pirnat v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ried v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Nathan Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Montano v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API