Pirnat v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
The State has petitioned for rehearing after our granting of appellant's petition to transfer in Pirnat v. State (1992), Ind., 600 N.E.2d 1342. We write today to clarify our brief opinion in that case.
Pirnat was decided on the same day as Lannan v. State (1992), 600 N.E.2d 1334. In Lonnan, we revisited the depraved sexual instinct exception and announced a new rule concerning the admissibility of prior bad acts in sex offense cases. Pirnat's petition raised a similar challenge to the use of depraved sexual instinct evidence. In accepting Pirnat's transfer petition, we…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Pirnat v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
4Cited by37 opinions
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Clausen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Dockery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.