Legal Opinion

Pirnat v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1993No. 82S01-9210-CR-837PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

The State has petitioned for rehearing after our granting of appellant's petition to transfer in Pirnat v. State (1992), Ind., 600 N.E.2d 1342. We write today to clarify our brief opinion in that case.

Pirnat was decided on the same day as Lannan v. State (1992), 600 N.E.2d 1334. In Lonnan, we revisited the depraved sexual instinct exception and announced a new rule concerning the admissibility of prior bad acts in sex offense cases. Pirnat's petition raised a similar challenge to the use of depraved sexual instinct evidence. In accepting Pirnat's transfer petition, we…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pirnat v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Clausen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dockery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API