Legal Opinion

Ruidoso State Bank v. Garcia

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1978No. 11950PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Ruidoso State Bank seeks replevin, under security agreements, of two vehicles owned by Danny and Lillian Garcia. The Bank had previously obtained a default judgment in this case on promissory notes and had levied on the two vehicles. However, the Garcias claimed an exemption and the district court released the vehicles. The trial court denied the writ of replevin. The Bank appeals.

The issues are:

1. Is the Bank precluded from replevying the vehicles under the security agreements by having first sued on the debt and having obtained a default judgment thereon?

2. Did the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cabot v. First National Bank of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Matter of Adrian Research and Chemical Co., Inc., Bankrupt, William M. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Flint v. KimbroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Snake River Equipment Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Brenton State Bank of Jefferson v. TiffanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. FARMERS STATE BANK IN AFTON v. BallewCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Ceres Fertilizer, Inc. v. BeekmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Bank of Piper City v. A-Way, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API