Ruidoso State Bank v. Garcia
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Justice.
Ruidoso State Bank seeks replevin, under security agreements, of two vehicles owned by Danny and Lillian Garcia. The Bank had previously obtained a default judgment in this case on promissory notes and had levied on the two vehicles. However, the Garcias claimed an exemption and the district court released the vehicles. The trial court denied the writ of replevin. The Bank appeals.
The issues are:
1. Is the Bank precluded from replevying the vehicles under the security agreements by having first sued on the debt and having obtained a default judgment thereon?
2. Did the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cabot v. First National Bank of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Matter of Adrian Research and Chemical Co., Inc., Bankrupt, William M. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Flint v. KimbroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by17 opinions
- Snake River Equipment Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brenton State Bank of Jefferson v. TiffanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- FARMERS STATE BANK IN AFTON v. BallewCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Ceres Fertilizer, Inc. v. BeekmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State Bank of Piper City v. A-Way, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.