Legal Opinion

Marquis v. Marquis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 24, 2008No. Docket: Aro-07-387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Paul Marquis appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Fort Kent, Griffiths, A.R.J.) holding him in contempt. He argues that the parties’ amended divorce judgment is ambiguous regarding the duration of his spousal support obligations and he thus cannot be held in contempt for failing to comply with a court order requiring him to pay Bernadette Marquis spousal support. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the District Court.

[¶ 2] Paul and Bernadette Marquis were divorced on November 7, 2000. In July 2001, the parties agreed to amend the amount of spousal support to $450 per month…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WeinschenkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Sager v. Town of BowdoinhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  3. White v. NasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. Hamill v. LibertySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. Richards v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pappas v. PappasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API