Legal Opinion

White v. Aaronson

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

One of the questions presented on the present application is whether individuals may escape the statutory liability of stockholders of a State bank by the device of having the stock held by a corporation the stock of which is *594owned by said individuals. The Federal courts have repeatedly held that stockholders of holding companies owning stock in National banks are liable to assessment on the theory that they are the actual and beneficial owners of the stock and may not use the corporate form to defeat the statutory intent to impose liability upon those who have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Tuyl v. . ScharmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Fors v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Todd v. Temple Hospital Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Harris Investment Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. NemecekNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API